PERAN YURISPRUDENSI MAHKAMAH AGUNG DALAM MEMBENTUK KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN KONSISTENSI PUTUSAN DI INDONESIA: STUDI KEPUSTAKAAN
Keywords:
Supreme Court jurisprudence, legal certainty, consistency of decisions, Indonesia, literature reviewAbstract
This study discusses the important role of Supreme Court jurisprudence in establishing legal certainty and consistency of decisions in the Indonesian judicial system. Although the Indonesian legal system emphasises written sources of law, the emergence and application of jurisprudence has become increasingly significant, especially in overcoming legal ambiguities and gaps resulting from inadequate regulations in legislation. By providing interpretative guidelines and practical standards, Supreme Court decisions serve as persuasive references for lower courts, thereby minimising disparity in rulings and enhancing the predictability of case outcomes. This study highlights how the utilisation of jurisprudence not only strengthens public trust in the judicial system but also contributes to the integrity and legitimacy of court decisions. However, challenges remain, such as limited access to relevant decisions and uneven understanding among judges. Therefore, sustained efforts—including the digitisation of decisions and regular training—are needed to optimise the function of jurisprudence in achieving legal certainty and consistency in Indonesia.
References
Achmad Dodi Haryadi, Hartiwiningsih, & Arief Hidayat. (2022). Consistency of Constitutional Court Decisions in Realizing Fair Legal Certainty. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211112.033
Adnan Hamid & Nina Silvana. (2025). The impact of the constitutional court decision number 168/PUU-XXI/2023 concerning Law Number 6 of 2023 and its implications. International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy, 7(1), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v7i1.737
Asfanrudin Lingga & Syahrul Affan. (2025). Pandangan Penghulu Kantor Urusan Agama Kecamatan Pangkalan Susu terhadap Pencatatan Nikah di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Studi Multidisipliner: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2332950
Badan Litbang Diklat Kumdil Mahkamah Agung RI. (2020). Kompilasi Yurisprudensi Tahun 2020. https://jdih.itb.ac.id/pustaka/viewfile/koleksi-himpunan-yurisprudensi/Yurisprudensi%202020%20Penelitian%20dan%20Pengembangan%20Mahkamah%20Agung%20Republik%20Indonesia.pdf
Dewi, S. (2021). Politik Hukum PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan dan Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Pemidanaan Pelaku Korupsi. Jurnal Wawasan Yustisia, 5(2), 200–223.
Dian Agung Wicaksono. (2023). Impact of Constitutional Court Decisions on the Supreme Court in Indonesia. Constitutional Review.
Edison, Y. (2023). Peran Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung dalam Menciptakan Kepastian Hukum. YUDHISTIRA: Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum Dan Peradilan, 1(3), 53–68.
Eliyah, E., & Aslan, A. (2025). STAKE’S EVALUATION MODEL: METODE PENELITIAN. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Indonesia, 3(2), Article 2.
Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing Narrative Literature Reviews for Peer-Reviewed Journals. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 52–57.
Imron Rosyadi & Agus Kahar. (2023). Analysis of Legal Certainty Aspects in Indonesian Marriage Registration Rule. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 12(3), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.12.3.2023.469-488
Irfan Iryadi, Teuku Syahrul Ansar, Jumadil Saputra, Teuku Afrizal, & Ahmad Syauqi Thirafi. (2021). The Role of Jurisprudence as Form of Legal Prescriptions. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development. https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2021.17.8
Lukas Norman Kbarek, Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini, Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku, & I Dewa Gede Herman Yudiawan. (2023). The Synergy Between Law and Technology Towards Justice System Reform in Indonesia. Sociological Jurisprudence Journal, 6(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.22225/scj.6.2.2023.123-132
Luthfi Widagdo Eddyono. (2021). Consistency of the Constitutional Court’s Decisions in Resolving Disputes Over the Authority of State Institutions. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law and Human Rights 2021. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211112.033
Muhammad Jibril, Melodia Puji Inggarwati, I Wayan Bhayu Eka Pratama, Antonius Prabu Soeryo Legowo, & Mario Jon Jordi. (2023). Jurisprudence as a Source of Law in Indonesia: Lessons from the Common Law. Jurnal Jurisprudence, 13(1), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v13i1.1967
Nurman Siddiq & Rudhiana Salam. (2025). Enhancing Legal Certainty through Legal Reform in Indonesia. Strata Law Review, 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.59631/slr.v3i1.62
Qamar, N., Simanjuntak, T., & Nasrullah, I. (2023). Putusan Pengadilan Sebagai Sumber Hukum Yurispudensi. Jurnal Wathan, 4(1), 99–112.
Rida Ista Sitepu & Nuchraha Alhuda Hasnda. (2023). Analysis of the Implementation of E-Litigation with Artificial Intelligence in Indonesian Judiciary. Perspektif Hukum. https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v24i1.275
Sarifudin, dkk. (2024). Kepastian Hukum dalam Putusan Hakim: Studi Terhadap Inkonsistensi Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung. YUDHISTIRA: Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum Dan Peradilan, 2(3), 76–84.
Sembiring, R., & Rohimah, N. (2021). Daya Saing Nasional dan Peran Penting Konsistensi Putusan Perkara Komersial Indonesia. https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel-hukum/2443-daya-saing-nasional-dan-peran-penting-konsistensi-putusan-perkara-komersial-indonesia
Sholahuddin Al-Fatih & Zaka Firma Aditya. (2019). Hoax and The Principle of Legal Certainty in Indonesian Legal System. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Business, Law And Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.13-2-2019.2286165
Sinto Adi Prasetyorini. (2024). Reimagining Legal Aid Institution Regulations to Enhance Legal Clarity. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(5), e03418. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i5.3418
