EFEKTIVITAS SANKSI ALTERNATIF (KERJA SOSIAL) DALAM KUHP BARU UNTUK TINDAK PIDANA RINGAN: TINJAUAN PUSTAKA COMPARATIF DENGAN PRAKTIK DI NEGARA LAIN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20591981Keywords:
community service, New Criminal Code, alternative sanctions, minor offences, restorative justice, comparative criminal lawAbstract
This study aims to analyse the effectiveness of alternative sanctions in the form of community service under the New Criminal Code (KUHP) (Law No. 1 of 2023) for minor offences, as well as to conduct a comparative literature review of community service practices in other countries. The research method employed is a literature review (library research) using a juridical-normative approach, a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a comparative approach. The results of the study indicate that community service under the New Criminal Code has great potential to serve as an effective alternative sanction, as it is designed to be more proportionate, humane, and rehabilitation-oriented compared to short-term imprisonment, whilst also addressing the issue of prison overcrowding. However, its effectiveness cannot be automatically achieved without the support of operational implementing regulations, robust oversight mechanisms, and a structured evaluation system. A comparative review with the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and Canada shows that the success of community service is highly dependent on the strengthening of probation institutions, a strict monitoring and evaluation system, and coordination between law enforcement agencies and local governments. This study recommends that the central government immediately issue implementing regulations, optimise the role of the Correctional Services Agency, and adopt best practices from the countries under comparison to ensure that community service achieves the intended objectives of sentencing.
References
Boone, M. (2010). Only for Minor Offences: Community Service in the Netherlands. European Journal of Probation, 2(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/206622031000200103
Bourgon, G. (2024). Community Corrections in Canada. In The Routledge Handbook on Global Community Corrections. Routledge.
Brook, C. A., Fiannaca, B., Harvey, D., & Marcus, P. (2015). A comparative look at plea bargaining in Australia, Canada, England, New Zealand, and the United States. Wm. & Mary L. Rev., 57, 1147.
Council, N. R., Education, D. of B. and S. S. and, Justice, C. on L. and, & Crime, C. on C. S. and D. from. (2007). Parole, Desistance from Crime, and Community Integration. National Academies Press.
Eliyah, E., & Aslan, A. (2025). STAKE’S EVALUATION MODEL: METODE PENELITIAN. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Indonesia, 3(2), Article 2.
Erdianti, R. N., Pratama, B. R., & Said, M. H. M. (2025). The Short-Term Imprisonment of Independence Penalty from the Perspective of Punishment Objectives as Criminal Law Reform in Indonesia. Indonesia Law Reform Journal, 5(2), 261–286. https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v5i2.41561
Falah, T. A. A. (2025). Analisis Pidana Kerja Sosial Sebagai Alternatif Pidana Jangka Pendek: Perspektif KUHP Baru Indonesia. Mahkamah: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 151–160.
Febriani, U., Sari, B. A., Edwar, M., & Utami, R. A. (2026). Pidana Kerja Sosial sebagai Alternatif Pemidanaan dalam Perspektif Penologi dan Sistem Penitensier Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 2(3), 644–648.
Gormley, J., Hamilton, M., & Belton, I. (2022). The effectiveness of sentencing options on reoffending. https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/306911/1/306911.pdf
Indriani, M., & Hidayatullah. (2026). ARAH KEBIJAKAN PEMIDANAAN BERBASIS KERJA SOSIAL DALAM SISTEM HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA. Judge : Jurnal Hukum, 6(06), 2025–2032. https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v6i06.2078
Justice, M. of. (2022). Proven reoffending statistics: January to March 2023. Government Statistics.
MacKenzie, D. L. (2002). Reducing the criminal activities of known offenders and delinquents: Crime prevention in the courts and corrections. In Evidence-Based Crime Prevention. Routledge.
Osgood, D. W. (2005). On Your Own Without a Net: The Transition to Adulthood for Vulnerable Populations. University of Chicago Press.
Pangaribuan, J. S. M. T. (2025). PIDANA KERJA SOSIAL SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN HUKUM PIDANA UNTUK MENGURANGI BEBAN LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN. Gevangenen : Jurnal Kajian Lembaga Pemasyarakatan, 1(2), 13–27.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Spaans, E. C. (1998). Community Service in the Netherlands: Its Effects on Recidivism and Net-Widening. International Criminal Justice Review, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/105756779800800101
Tonry, M. (2013). “Nothing” Works: Sentencing “Reform” in Canada and the United States. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 55(4), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2012.ES03
Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan. (2025). Data Overcrowding Lapas dan Rutan, Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.


