PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA MEDIS PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 1/PUU-XXIV/2025: ANALISIS KAJIAN PUSTAKA TERHADAP PERUBAHAN PARADIGMA TANGGUNG JAWAB MEDIS DAN DAMPAKNYA TERHADAP HUKUM KESEHATAN INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20591999Keywords:
medical disputes, Constitutional Court Decision No. 1/PUU-XXIV/2025, medical liability, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Indonesian health law, Professional Disciplinary Council, fault-based liabilityAbstract
Medical disputes are an increasingly prominent phenomenon within Indonesia’s healthcare system, in line with the public’s growing legal awareness of patients’ rights. This study aims to analyse the shift in the paradigm of medical liability and the impact of Constitutional Court Decision No. 1/PUU-XXIV/2025 on the medical dispute resolution system in Indonesia, using a normative legal research method with a literature review approach. The results of the study indicate that the Constitutional Court’s decision has fundamentally altered the paradigm of medical liability from a fault-based liability approach towards a more proportional system with stronger legal protection for healthcare professionals acting in accordance with professional standards. The mechanism for resolving medical disputes has undergone a transformation with the strengthening of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) as the primary step before litigation, the independence of the Indonesian Health Council (KKI) and the Medical College, and the clarification of the rational boundary between medical risk and criminal negligence through the role of the Professional Disciplinary Council as a professional gatekeeper. The implications for Indonesian health law include the codification of a more effective ADR system, the strengthening of legal protection for healthcare professionals to prevent the criminalisation of medical actions that comply with standards, and the guarantee of access to justice for patients who have genuinely suffered harm through mechanisms that are faster, cheaper, confidential and fair. This study concludes that the transformation of the medical dispute resolution system reflects the maturity of Indonesia’s health law system, which seeks to balance patients’ rights to health and legal protection for healthcare professionals.
References
Dahlan, R. H., Saragih, B., Emaliawati, & Santoso, J. D. N. (2025). Menemukan Keadilan di Ruang Praktik Restorative Justice dalam Dunia Kedokteran. Kreasi Cendekia Pustaka.
Eliyah, E., & Aslan, A. (2025). STAKE’S EVALUATION MODEL: METODE PENELITIAN. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Indonesia, 3(2), Article 2.
Hartati, D., & Pratama, B. (2025). Paradigma Baru Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis di Indonesia. Jurnal Retentum, 7(1), 205–215.
INDARWATI, H. (2011). URGENSI PEMBENTUKAN KOMITE ETIK DAN HUKUM DI RUMAH SAKIT DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA MEDIS SECARA NON LITIGASI [Masters, Unika Soegijapranata Semarang]. https://repository.unika.ac.id/18074/
Junaidi, & Gunawan, M. A. (2024). Combined Process: Metode Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik Perspektif Undang-Undang Kesehatan. Proceeding Masyarakat Hukum Kesehatan Indonesia, 1(01), 196–204.
Koto, I., & Asmadi, E. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Terhadap Tindakan Malpraktik Tenaga Medis di Rumah Sakit. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 181–192. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v4i2.5372
Maikel, M. P., Jak, Y., & Hutapea, F. (2024). Peran Komite Etik dan Hukum Rumah Sakit Dalam Peningkatan Mutu Pelayanan, Keselamatan Pasien, dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik Di Rumah Sakit Syarif Hidayatullah Tahun 2023. Journal Of The Indonesian Medical Association, 74(4), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.47830/jinma-vol.74.4-2024-1482
Margono, R. (2026). Aspek Hukum Medis: Malpraktik Kedokteran dan Perlindungan Pasien. Profesor Rudi Margono.
Mayora, E. T. R., & Yusuf, H. (2024). Kebijakan Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis Melalui Restorative Justice Nonlitigasi Mediasi Pendekatan Win-Win Solution. Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara, 1(2), 2516–2527.
Mendrofa, A. (2026). Kerangka Strategis Mendukung Kesejahteraan dan Kesehatan Mental Karyawan untuk Berkembang Bersama. Jurnal Ekonomi (LIKUID), 2(01), 103–106. https://doi.org/10.70404/likuid.v2i01.584
Psomas, E. (2021). Future research methodologies of lean manufacturing: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 12(6), 1146–1183. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-06-2020-0082
Rai, S., & Devaiah, V. H. (2019). The need for healthcare reforms: Is no-fault liability the solution to medical malpractice? Asian Bioethics Review, 11(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-019-00081-7
Santos, A. C., & Yusuf, H. (2024). Mekanisme Keadilan Restoratif Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis dan Tinjauan Yuridis Menurut UU Kesehatan Tahun 2023. Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara, 1(2), 2096–2106.
SATRIA, I. K. (2023). Sosialisasi Tentang Ulasan Undang-Undang No. 17 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kesehatan. BIROKRASI Учредители: Politeknik Pratama Purwokerto, 1(4), 143–156.
Setyo, F. (2024). Analisis Regulasi Telemedicine: Perlindungan Hukum dan Implikasi bagi Tenaga Kesehatan. Proceeding Masyarakat Hukum Kesehatan Indonesia, 1(01), 149–158.
Tadda, A., Indar, I., & Ilyas, A. (2022). Tinjauan Hukum Eksistensi Komite Etik Dan Hukum Rumah Sakit (KEHRS) Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik. Jurnal Ilmiah Ecosystem, 22(1), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.35965/eco.v22i1.1392
Taufik, A. I. (2019). Konsistensi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Beberapa Undang-Undang Terkait Kesehatan. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(4), 763–784.
W, J. K., Arief, D., Susanto, E., Siagian, C., Ambarsari, R., & Melany, E. (2023). KEWENANGAN PRESIDEN DALAM KONSIL KEDOKTERAN INDONESIA (ANALISA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO.128/PK/TUN/2022). Jurnal UDA, 31(1), 1005–1014. https://doi.org/10.46930/ojsuda.v31i1.3058
Wahyuni, D. (2024). PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN PIDANA BAGI PERAWAT SEBAGAI TENAGA KESEHATAN YANG MELAKUKAN KESALAHAN DALAM PELAYANAN KESEHATAN [PhD Thesis, Wijaya kusuma surabaya universitiy]. https://erepository.uwks.ac.id/17968/7/JURNAL%20SKRIPSI%20DIAN%20WY.pdf
Widjaja, G. (2023). PEMAHAMAN TENAGA KESEHATAN TERHADAP BERLAKUNYA UU NO.17 TAHUN 2023. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY DEDICATION, 2(3), 64–76.
Widjaja, G. (2026). PERAN KOLEGIUM BERDASARKAN UU NO.17 TAHUN 2023. Jurnal Kesehatan, 3(12), 562–569. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20254105
Wijaya, H., Pardede, C. D., & Sinambela, H. (2025). Rekonstruksi Perlindungan Hukum bagi Dokter dalam Praktik Telemedicine: Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(12). https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i12.1889
Yandi, R., Zuhri, B., Yatim, Y., & Kaksim, K. (2025). The Implementation and Historical Perspective of Health Law in Law No. 17 of 2023. TOFEDU: The Future of Education Journal, 4(6), 2492–2499. https://doi.org/10.61445/tofedu.v4i6.786
Yuditia, A., Hidayat, Y., & Achmad, S. (2021). Pelaksanaan Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional Oleh Bpjs Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 40 Tahun 2004 Tentang Sistem Jaminan Sosial Nasional. Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum, 6(1), 43–61.
Yusuf, H. (2025). Dinamika Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis Melalui Mediasi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Kesehatan Nomor 17 Tahun 2023. Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 2(1), 1283–1293.
Zarzani, T. R. (2025). Legal Drafting Dalam Hukum Kesehatan. Serasi Media Teknologi.
Mahkamah Konstitusi. (2025). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 1/PUU-XXIV/2025.
PERSI. (2024). Pedoman penanganan kasus pelayanan medik yang berpotensi sengketa hukum di rumah sakit: Sengketa antara pasien dan rumah sakit. Perhimpunan Rumah Sakit Seluruh Indonesia.
Sindonews. (2025, Desember 16). LSP hukum kesehatan Indonesia diresmikan, BNSP: Perkuat penyelesaian sengketa medis.
