MEDICAL REHABILITATION RELAPSE RATE AT BNN BULELENG REGENCY: JURIDICAL AND SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21287986Keywords:
legal, relapse, narcoticsAbstract
Drug abuse is a crime that not only has a legal dimension but also wide-ranging sociological implications, including the emergence of relapse among users after undergoing the recovery process. This research aims to analyze narcotics within the legal dimension and examine the optimization of relapse rehabilitation for individuals at the National Narcotics Agency (BNN) of Buleleng Regency from a juridical-sociological perspective. The research uses an empirical legal method with a descriptive-analytical nature thru a legislative approach and factual reality in the field, particularly related to the implementation of Article 54 of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. The research results show that normatively, drug addicts and victims of drug abuse are required to undergo medical and social rehabilitation as a form of recovery, not merely punishment. However, in practice in Buleleng Regency, the implementation of medical rehabilitation has not been optimal due to limited facilities and infrastructure. The Buleleng District Narcotics Agency (BNN) does not yet have independent inpatient medical rehabilitation facilities, so patients must be referred outside the region, such as to the Bali Provincial Mental Hospital in Bangli and the Mangunsada Hospital in Badung. This condition indicates a gap between the ideal (das sollen) and the reality (das sein) in the implementation of narcotics rehabilitation. In addition, factors such as the social environment, regional characteristics, and the strong addictive nature of narcotics also increase the risk of relapse. Thus, the optimization of rehabilitation in Buleleng requires strengthening the infrastructure of medical services, enhancing the institutional capacity of the National Narcotics Agency (BNN), and synergizing legal and social approaches so that the recovery of users can proceed effectively and sustainably.
References
Aberson, C. L., Healy, M., & Romero, V. (2000). Ingroup Bias and Self-Esteem: A Meta-Analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_04
Atkinson, W. (2023). Marxism versus Bourdieu on Domination, Consciousness and Resistance: An Engagement with Burawoy on Bourdieu. Thesis Eleven, 175(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136231165045
Bai, C., Gong, Y., & Feng, C. (2019). Social Trust, Pattern of Difference and Subjective Well-Being. Sage Open, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019865765
Bastian, B., Jetten, J., Chen, H., Radke, H. R. M., Harding, J. F., & Fasoli, F. (2012). Losing Our Humanity: The Self-Dehumanizing Consequences of Social Ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(2), 156–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212471205
Bauder, H. (2012). Jus Domicile: In Pursuit of a Citizenship of Equality and Social Justice. Journal of International Political Theory, 8(1–2), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.3366/jipt.2012.0038
Bernardo, G. A. Di, Vezzali, L., Stathi, S., Keown, S. M., Cocco, V. M., Saguy, T., & Dixon, J. (2021). Fostering Social Change Among Advantaged and Disadvantaged Group Members: Integrating Intergroup Contact and Social Identity Perspectives on Collective Action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219889134
Bidadanure, J. (2016). Making Sense of Age Group Justice: A Time for Relational Equality? Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 15(3), 234–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X16650542
Burkitt, I. (2016). Relational Agency: Relational Sociology, Agency and Interaction. European Journal of Social Theory, 19(3), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431015591426
Carter, M. J. (2013). Advancing Identity Theory: Examining The Relationship Between Activated Identities and Behavior in Different Social Contexts. Social Psychology Quarterly, 76(3), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272513493095
Cass, N., Shove, E., & Urry, J. (2005). Social Exclusion, Mobility and Access. Sociological Review, 53(3), 539–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00565.x
Chafe, R. (2023). Rejecting Choices: The Problematic Origins of Researcher-Defined Paradigms within Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231165951
Connolly, M. (2013). Achieving Social Mobility: The Role of Equality Law. International Journal of Discrimination and The Law, 13(4), 261–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358229113496947
Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., Lure, M. Mac, Otterstad, A. M., Torrance, H., Cannella, G. S., Ljungberg, M. K., & Tier, T. M. (2017). Critical Qualitative Methodologies: Reconceptualizations and Emergent Construction. International Review of Qualitative Research, 10(4), 482–498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2017.10.4.482
Ellemers, N., & Jetten, J. (2013). The Many Ways to Be Marginal in a Group. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312453086
Epstein, B. (2016). A Framework for Social Ontology. Philosophy of The Social Sciences, 46(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393115613494
Fowler, B. (2006). Autonomy, Reciprocity and Science in the Thought of Pierre Bourdieu. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(6), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406069777
Frost, L., & Hoggett, P. (2008). Human Agency and Social Suffering. Critical Social Policy, 28(4), 438–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018308095279
Furlong, D. E., & Lester, J. N. (2022). Toward a Practice of Qualitative Methodological Literature Reviewing. Qualitative Inquiry, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004221131028
Greenberg, J. (2008). Understanding The Vital Human Quest for Self-Esteem. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00061.x
Harris, N. (2019). Book Review: Critique as Social Practice (Critical Theory and Social Self-Understanding). European Journal of Social Theory, 22(1), 123–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431018814347
Holdt, K. von. (2013). The Violence of Order, Orders of Violence: Between Fanon and Bourdieu. Current Sociology, 61(2), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392112456492
Honneth, A. (2019). Recognition, Democracy and Social Liberty: A Reply. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 45(6), 694–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453719843439
Jaegher, H. de, & Froese, T. (2009). On The Role of Social Interaction in Individual Agency. Adaptive Behavior, 17(5), 444–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712309343822
Janmaat, J. G. (2011). Ability Grouping, Segregation and Civic Competences Among Adolescents. International Sociology, 26(4), 455–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580910393044
Jiang, T., Chen, Z., Wang, S., & Hou, Y. (2021). Ostracism Disrupts Self-Continuity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(9), 1390–1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220974496
Jordan, B. (2003). Criminal Justice, Social Exclusion and The Social Contract. Probation Journal: The Journal of Community and Criminal Justice, 50(3), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550503503002
Juul, S. (2010). Solidarity and Social Cohesion in Late Modernity: A Question of Recognition, Justice and Judgement in Situation. European Journal of Social Theory, 13(2), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431010362296
Killaspy, H., White, S., Lalvani, N., Berg, R., Thachil, A., Kallumpuram, S., Nasiruddin, O., Wright, C., & Mezey, G. (2014). The Impact of Psychosis on Social Inclusion and Associated Factors. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 60(2), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764012471918
Krishnan, L. (2015). Social Exclusion, Mental Health, Disadvantage and Injustice. Psychology and Developing Societies, 27(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971333615594053
Laughlin, P. R. (2011). Social Choice Theory, Social Decision Scheme Theory and Group Decision Making. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210372524
Lee, Y., & Ko, Y. G. (2018). Feeling Lonely When Not Socially Isolated: Social Isolation Moderates The Association Between Loneliness and Daily Social Interaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(10), 1340–1355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517712902
Lynch, A. P. (2016). Politics, Recognition and Personality: Selfhood and Social Change in Late Modernity. International Sociology Reviews, 31(5), 533–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580916655751
Pleasants, N. (2019). Free Will, Determinism and The “Problem” of Structure and Agency in The Social Sciences. Philosophy of The Social Sciences, 49(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393118814952
Procyshyn, A. (2017). Can Social Systems Theory Be Used for Immanent Critique? Thesis Eleven, 143(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513617741167
Renger, D., Renger, S., Miche, M., & Simon, B. (2017). A Social Recognition Approach to Autonomy: The Role of Equality Based Respect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(4), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216688212
Renstrom, E. A., Back, H., & Knapton, H. M. (2020). Exploring a Pathway to Radicalization: The Effects of Social Exclusion and Rejection Sensitivity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(8), 1204–1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220917215
Rossier, T. (2019). Prosopography, Networks, Life Course Sequences, and so on. Quantifying with or beyond Bourdieu? BMS Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/ Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique, 144(1), 6–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0759106319880148
Shteynberg, G., Hirsh, J. B., Garthoff, J., & Bentley, R. A. (2022). Agency and Identity in The Collective Self. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 26(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683211065921
Simanyi, L. P. (2014). Bourdieu, Ethics and Symbolic Power. Sociological Review, 62(4), 651–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12210
Sonpar, S. (2015). Including, Excluding...Annihilating. Psychology and Developing Societies, 27(2), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971333615592996
Steele, M. (2017). Social Imaginaries and The Theory of The Normative Utterance. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 43(10), 1045–1071. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453717715294
Stets, J. E., Burke, P. J., & Savage, S. V. (2018). Exchange, Identity Verification, and Social Bonds. Social Psychology Quarterly, 81(3), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272518785866
Strydom, P. (2017). Infinity, Infinite Processes and Limit Concepts: Recovering a Neglected Background of Social and Critical Theory. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 43(8), 793–811. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453717692845
Taki, K. El. (2021). Subordinates Quest for Recognition in Hierarchy. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 50(1), 55–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298211050953
Thompson, M. J. (2019). Hierarchy, Social Pathology and The Failure of Recognition Theory. European Journal of Social Theory, 22(1), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431018768625
Urcia, I. A. (2021). Comparisons of Adaptations in Grounded Theory and Phenomenology: Selecting the Specific Qualitative Research Methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211045474
Wacquant, L. (2013). Bourdieu 1993: A Case Study in Scientific Consecration. Sociology, 47(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038512472588
Wesselmann, E. D., & Williams, K. D. (2017). Social Life and Social Death: Inclusion, Ostracism and Rejection in Groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(5), 693–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217708861
Yilmaz, O., & Saribay, S. A. (2019). Moral Foundations Explain Unique Variance in Political Ideology Beyond Resistance to Change and Opposition to Equality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(8), 1124–1138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218781012
Zambrana, R. E. (2021). Intersectionality as Critical Social Theory. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 50(4), 315–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/00943061211021084f
